The two-member bench issued its reserved judgment on an intra-court appeal by the former prime minister against the single bench verdict of the same court that had turned down the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) chairman's appeal against his trial in the Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.

The trial is being held in the Adiala Jail, where 71-year-old Khan has been kept since September 26 when shifted there from District Jail, Attock.

The Ministry of Law issued a no-objection certificate (NOC) for the jail trial of Khan as requested by the Interior Ministry and special court Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain on August 29.

Earlier in the morning, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) panel of justices Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Saman Rafat Imtiaz heard the intra-court appeal of Khan and reserved the judgment after completing the hearing process.

According to the short verdict, the government's notification of August 29 to hold the jail trial of Khan was declared illegal. However, the court stated that there was no bar on the jail trial of an accused in case of extraordinary circumstances and it was up to the judge to keep such trial open or in-camera.

The two-member bench said that the trial judge should give a ruling in favour of a jail trial and the government following the ruling should issue a notification for the same.

According to the short judgment issued by the court, the IHC accepted the intra-court appeal against the verdict of its single-member bench of October 16.

It also refused to give retrospective effect to the decision of the Cabinet of November 15 that sanctioned the jail trial.

The court also upheld the appointment of Judge Abual Hasnat Zulqarnain, who is conducting Khan's trial under the Official Secrets Act.

There was some confusion over the impact of the verdict on the fate of Khan's trial in jail as the court accepted the appeal on procedural and technical grounds.

Senior lawyer Yasin Azad told Samaa TV after the verdict that the jail trial came to a halt after the verdict but the government can address the lacunae in the procedure adopted for the trial. "The government can also file an appeal against the verdict in the Supreme Court," he said.

He also said that the verdict has no impact on the proceedings adopted so far, meaning that Khan's indictment still stood intact.

However, lawyer Abid Zuberi stated that the court by rejecting the jail trial also nullified all the proceedings and actions taken so far during the jail trial. "The verdict has rejected the jail trial right from the beginning," he said.

Jehangir Jadoon, former Advocate General of Islamabad, said that the court granted the appeal on technical grounds because it rejected the procedure adopted by the government for Khan's jail trial. "Some of the finer details will be cleared once the detailed judgment is issued," he said.

In March 2022, Khan and his foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi were alleged to have violated the secrecy laws of the country while handling a communication (cipher) sent by Pakistan's embassy in Washington. The diplomatic cable reportedly went missing from Khan's possession.

The duo, who had claimed that the cable contained a threat from the United States to topple the PTI's government, was indicted on October 23. Their formal trial has begun with the recording of statements by the witnesses two weeks ago.

The IHC had upheld the indictment when challenged by Khan. However, the IHC had stayed the trial until adjudication on the intra-court appeal.

• KAJAL AGARWAL